Evolution, cancer, cellular differentiation, and gene expression in a complex circular DNA model

If eukaryotic chromosomes are composed of complex circular structures instead of the simple linear structures assumed by mainstream science, how are replication, tissue differentiation, and gene expression regulated?

Since this is a blog and not a scientific treatise, let me try to put this into a nutshell:

Cellular differentiation may involve two distinctly different kinds of processes:

1) Binding up of much of the pristine genome into inactive heterochromatin. This process is reversible, allowing for this portion of the genome to be recruited at some later date (partial dedifferentiation).

2) Permanent alteration of most of the remaining origins of replication in a way that either converts them into promoters of transcription, RNA splice sites, or enhancers of transcription.

Permanent alterations of origins may actually involve double origins shared by two adjacent circular DNA elements. During the course of promoter formation, the internal sequences of this double origin may be deleted out, causing a partial fusion of the two circular elements into a large circular element. A similar process could also occur with splice sites, except that additional sequences are removed. Alternatively, these circular elements may completely separate, leaving each circle with a single, simple origin. One circle is deleted from the genome, the other circle remains attached and the single origin becomes an enhancer.

In other words, at one point in time, origins, promoters, splice sites, and, enhancers may have been one and the same. You can learn more about these hypotheses by delving into the blog and looking at the models page tab.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7636981

This model also allows for enhancers of transcription to be physically much closer to their promoters even though they may appear much farther away when these circulars are ripped apart by conventional DNA analysis procedures. The larger the circular element, the further away the enhancer appears from its promoter if the circle is split between the promoter and its nearby enhancer.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC136320/

Fig 17

Undifferentiated replicon cluster

Fig 184

Differentiated replicon cluster

Evolution of the chromosome using this model

Now, we can take this model a step further and consider the evolution of chromosomes over geologic spans of time. In this scenario, there would exist ancient promoters, splice sites, and enhancers that “differentiated” eons ago from ancient origins of replication. These structures would remain “static” during the differentiation process relative to origin modifications. However, they could be excised together with their circular elements during the course of differentiation.

Atavism

Some heterochromatic compartments may have been locked up eons ago. Failure to do so could result in atavistic characteristics showing up, i.e., partial gene expression of the ancient ancestor.

Cancer

Cancer “evolves” in the body over time by an incremental increase in DNA rearrangements. Many of these alterations may be destroyed by apoptosis or even necrosis followed by phagocytosis. However, partial clusters of actively replicating DNA circular complexes could easily be incorporated either by the host cell or nearby neighbors. Such dramatic changes in the genome would either kill the cell or corrupt its replication and transcriptional  machinery.

Implications of the model on stem cell research

Stem cells would exist as compartments of differentiated and undifferentiated DNA. Generating new tissues from stem cells of a different tissue origin would require two things:

1) The original differentiated compartments becomes locked up as heterochromatin.

2) The undifferentiated compartments required to generate the new tissue type would have to be unlocked from heterochromatin and irreversibly differentiated into the new tissue type. These kinds of “hybrid” cells could theoretically revert back to the old state under the right conditions and that would require the new tissue type to be locked back up as heterochromatin.

Advertisements

About frankabernathy

I am a retired cell biologist and alumnus of Ohio State University. I became interested in chromosomes as far back as the 1960's when I wrote a term paper on the effects of radiomimetic drugs on chromosomes. I was fascinated at how they could break apart and reform new structures so easily. I became further involved in the early 1970's after taking a cytogenetics course at the University of Arkansas. I took that knowledge with me to Ohio State in 1980 where I eventually worked on my research and completed my Ph.D. dissertation, "Studies on Eukaryotic DNA Superstructure". My studies and later research suggested that the DNA within the eukaryotic chromosome is not the simple, linear molecular thread so widely suggested in all the classic textbooks published today. Instead, it may be the culmination of a geologically rapid set of endosymbiotic events where microorganisms plug into each other to create something greater than themselves. Feel free to contact me at fabernathy@sbcglobal.net.
This entry was posted in cellular differentiation, evolution. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s