Was Isaac Newton Wrong About Chromosomes?

Ok, I know this is bordering on bait and switch, but give me a break, ok? I have to compete with cute cats, the deep state, the end of the world, and people who can juggle fireballs while playing Beethoven’s Fifth. Well, perhaps I am hyperbolizing just a bit, but you get my drift. I know, I know. Isaac Newton didn’t even know what a chromosome was when he came up with his three laws of thermodynamics. Please don’t yawn, I’ll get right to the point here. One of his laws involved something called entropy or the state of disorder in a defined system.

NO YAWNING! THERE’S A QUIZ AND HEADS WILL ROLL!

Simply put, this law states that all systems tend to go from a defined state of order to one of more disorder. In other words, chaos reigns, at least where this law is concerned, anyway.  For example, if you hit a rock with a hammer it shatters into pieces. You never see the reverse do you? I mean have you ever seen a hammer hit a bunch of rock fragments which come together into a single rock as a result? I will assume I made my point here and move on before you go comatose on me. So many cat videos, so little time…

So here is the point I’m trying to make here. Let’s say you have a very, very, very long string floating in a viscous liquid and you cut it into various sizes along its length. The ends of each of these fragments have the capacity to stick together to form circles. However, compared to these “sticky” ends these fragments are enormously long. The odds of these ends ever finding each other in this three dimensional spaghetti-like soup of a mixture is very remote. This may be complicated by the fact that other fragments may have sticky ends that can link up to other fragments, making them longer instead of circular.

Does this sound kind of ridiculous? Well, perhaps that’s because it is. Wouldn’t it make more sense that instead of long random linear fragments forming circles, the circles were already there to begin with? If this makes sense, then, the long held notion that chromosomes are long strings of DNA makes no sense in light of what I discovered over 30 years ago.

Where Are You?

Is This Model Wrong?

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

About frankabernathy

I am a retired cell biologist and alumnus of Ohio State University. I became interested in chromosomes as far back as the 1960's when I wrote a term paper on the effects of radiomimetic drugs on chromosomes. I was fascinated at how they could break apart and reform new structures so easily. I became further involved in the early 1970's after taking a cytogenetics course at the University of Arkansas. I took that knowledge with me to Ohio State in 1980 where I eventually worked on my research and completed my Ph.D. dissertation, "Studies on Eukaryotic DNA Superstructure". My studies and later research suggested that the DNA within the eukaryotic chromosome is not the simple, linear molecular thread so widely suggested in all the classic textbooks published today. Instead, it may be the culmination of a geologically rapid set of endosymbiotic events where microorganisms plug into each other to create something greater than themselves. Feel free to contact me at fabernathy@sbcglobal.net.
This entry was posted in chromosome, circular DNA, evolution, Fallacies in science. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s