Are you nothing more than glorified “viruses”?

What if I told you your cells’ nuclei may actually be an amalgamation of viral, bacterial, fungal, and other forms of primitive eukaryotic DNA, all working together for the common good:………..YOU!

That’s a pretty humbling thought, isn’t it? Almost on the same level as ashes to ashes and dust to dust. However, we are talking about “living” dust here. Ads on TV talk about the shingles virus already being in you, as if that is the exception rather than the rule. Think about it. Why would the shingles virus find your nuclear DNA to be such an inviting place to take up residence, along with a host of other kinds of viruses? Why indeed. My blog talks about this in quite a bit of detail. You see, I don’t think external viruses entering your body is an exception to anything. They are just “latecomers” in an age old phenomenon that has been going on since life first originated on this planet. Contrary to popular theory, I do not believe the DNA in our chromosomes is merely a long, boring, continuous molecular thread, wound up like a firehose within the nucleus. It is much much more complex than that. There are physical “switches” in the DNA, much like a railroad track, that when triggered force the DNA into different configurations that vary within cell types. These configurations force the DNA to generate RNA and hence protein that is unique to the kind of cell in which they are being generated; in other words, cellular differentiation. When these switches get seriously messed up, the cells do one of two things: they destroy themselves through apoptosis or they become genetically corrupt and capable of evolving over time into something quite sinister: cancer.

Why apoptosis, why cancer? Apoptosis is nature’s way of insuring cancer never happens. It does this by completely destroying the cellular DNA in such as way that none of it “escapes”. Escapes? What does that mean, exactly? Well, such rogue DNA may be capable of taking on a life of its own because of how it was assembled over eons of time. It may even enter normal cells and take up residence in the DNA, just like an external virus, corrupting the genetic machinery of that cell and forcing it to replicate the entire cell in order to replicate the rogue DNA. This is why apoptosis is such a complex and energy intensive process. It must never allow this to happen. The risk to the viability of the organism (in this case, you) is just too great.

You can learn more about how nuclear DNA may have been assembled over the eons by reading through this blog or contacting me.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Circular eukaryotic DNA and cancer.

It seems the main place investigators “find” circular eukaryotic DNAs these days is when they’re looking at cancer cells which generate micronuclei and chromosomal rearrangements.  They call this DNA “pulverization” (see article link below). The chromosomes are literally “going nuts” with each cell division, breaking up and rearranging whatever is left. DNA replication becomes asynchronous, meaning a sizable number of these DNA chunks take on a life of their own, as if they were microorganisms in their own right. My question is simply this: How does this happen? Nobody seems to know. But I think I have an explanation for it. Check out the rest of my blog.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258507

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Circular eukaryotic DNA, no longer important?

I googled circular DNA today in a variety of formats and all I could come up with is journal articles dating back to the early 2000’s or earlier. If anyone knows of more recent articles relating to this topic I would appreciate an update. Otherwise, I must assume the scientific community has moved on to better (or easier) things.

The one shown below is a 2002 article.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1308322/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Aldous Huxley

Aldous Huxley

The facts still stand: How do you generate thousands of circles with orders of magnitude size differences from 40 linear mouse chromosomes? The most obvious answer is that they were already present in a cryptic form (click photos to enlarge).

Circles  91b

Degrading mouse cells, 400x magnification

What do mouse chromosomes look like under “normal” conditions? Check out this link: mouse chromosome.

 

Image | Posted on by | Leave a comment

Beating DNA into submission

How do you create a simple linear stretch of DNA that goes on and on, like some kind of endlessly meandering oil pipeline?

Well, first of all, you beat the living hell out of it so it breaks up into fragments. Next, get rid of any nonlinear fragments because, face it, they can’t be sequenced anyway. This is most easily done by throwing out the phenol phase used for DNA extraction which may contain any troublesome DNA/protein/lipid etc interactions. Next, take what’s left (linear DNA fragments) and artificially splice them together in your mind using overlapping sequences. If this doesn’t always work, just extrapolate until it does. Voilà! We now have a nice, neat (if somewhat boring) endlessly linear, stretch of DNA.

Circle sequencing

Chromosome Walking2 Chromosome walking 1

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

DNA origami, another word for artificial complex DNA superstructure

I find it amazing that scientists are able to tinker with DNA to generate an apparent infinite variety of two and three dimensional objects that are incredibly complex, detailed, and highly symmetrical, some like snowflakes. You can learn more about this nanotechnology by clicking on the link below:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v440/n7082/pdf/440283a.pdf

So my question is this: Why is it so difficult to connect the dots here? If man can generate such a wide array of DNA superstructures, why can’t nature? More to the point, the ability to exploit DNA in such a fashion is more than mere coincidence. Nature has been using complex DNA superstructures for eons to generate the chromosomes necessary for the complexity of multicellular life that now exists on this planet.

Natural DNA Origami

Hypothetical natural DNA “origami”           (circa 1991)

Learn more about natural DNA “origami” by reviewing this blog or contacting Dr. Frank Abernathy: fabernathy@sbcglobal.net

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Another heretical scientist dares to challenge the church of scientific orthodoxy.

This link is very interesting and at first glance seems totally unrelated to what usually appears on my blog. However, though the discovery is quite fascinating and worth reviewing, I mention it here for a different reason: The initial reaction of the scientific community to what they regard as heresy.

http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/HancockG10-Gunung-Padang-Latest.php

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment